Search This Site

This site requires Quick time to play its audio player if need.
----------------------------------------------
"A penny for your thoughts"

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Online medical records.

Medical records services, such as Microsoft HealthVault and Google Health, promises an explosion in the storage of personal health-care information online.

While the services aim to make it easier for consumers to access and manage their personal health information, the ready availability of this data also makes it much easier and less expensive for insurers to put your medical history under the microscope. In fact, the number of companies that have legal access to this information runs into the millions, say privacy advocates.

Microsoft kicked off the beta test of its HealthVault service almost a year ago, while Google announced its Google Health service last February and launched a beta in May. While both services are still in beta, each company has partnered with large health-care providers for pilot tests: Microsoft with Kaiser Permanente and Google with the Cleveland Clinic. Microsoft, Google, and other companies that put your medical records online ensure that their security is top-of-the-line. Their services are intended to give consumers greater, not less, control over who sees what by giving consumers personal ownership of their information, according to the services.


Indeed, consumers' control of their health data is not the core problem. It's what happens to your information after its initial release that worries privacy advocates — and with good reason. For instance, a July article in Business Week cited the case of a Louisiana couple denied health insurance because the wife took two medications that set off red flags for a prospective insurer.

Most observers — including privacy advocates — state that the move to store our health records in the cloud is inevitable. In fact, there are many benefits to consumers for having that information available virtually instantly. For example, if you were in a different city and needed to be rushed to the emergency room, your health history would be immediately available to the physicians on call.

The downside is that storing health records online makes it easier for insurers to calculate the odds that you will be more expensive to insure than the next person. That's the rub, say privacy advocates. There is a law that keeps health data from being misused called the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA. Moreover, there are many exceptions to the law. Additionally, both Microsoft and Google claim their health services are not subject to HIPAA regulation, since they don't offer health-care services themselves.


Patient Privacy Rights offers these recommendations and questions to
safeguard your health-care records:-

• Don't even think about using a personal health record (PHR) that's offered by an employer or insurer. These are the last companies with which you want to share all your personal health and daily activities.

• Don't simply rely on a "HIPAA-compliant" PHR. HIPAA has more loopholes than the tax law; millions of businesses can legally access your information without your consent.

• How do you authorize access to the information? If gaining access requires nothing more than having someone guess your password, say "no, thanks."

• Does the PHR provider have the right under its "agreements" to take, sell, or share your information?

• What security does the PHR provide?

For the time being it would be advisable to hold off signing up for any electronic health-records system. Giving more time for the system to be tested out especially the potential for identity theft .

View blog reactions

2 Comments:

The Medical Quack said...

Good comments on personal health records. You are right if given a choice on participating with giving the records to an insurance company, like Aetna, who offers this service versus Microsoft or Google, a real no brainer there as to who you might trust first.

I have a wealth of information on my site on the subject too. And yes it is still in it's infancy and they are now in the process of trying to come up with some type of certification process like they do for electronic records used by doctors and hospitals, but I think due to gray areas, this may take a while.

Security wise though I think both Microsoft and Google have written the book there as no two other companies have been the targets of hacking more than they have, so they get better, so it is a matter of who do you trust.

There are many pilot programs going on too, one with medical records on disabilities being sent to social security already, so you do wonder sometimes if we will every have real privacy down the road. Read about the MIB too at my site and that is scary too as the insurance companies all exchange data on all of us and your medication rap sheet is also being looked at too when it comes to qualifying for health insurance. It is amazing as to what is already out there and the average consumer has not one clue.

Anyway, good post and check out the Medical Quack if you like. Thanks!

Adam said...

By obtaining a copy of immunization records, you can easily benefit in that you know exactly what diseases and conditions you have less of a chance of developing. It is important to also keep up with the updates in order to ensure proper defenses from various types of medical conditions, as well as infectious diseases.

Post a Comment